[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
From: |
Karl Hammar |
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
Date: |
Sun, 18 May 2008 00:44:59 +0200 (CEST) |
Valentin:
> 2008/5/17 Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>:
>
> > we can have a -dmidi-extension=mid, and change the default for the
> > Windows binary.
>
> Another feature that would be greatly appreciated (once again, this is
> an idea from the French list) would be the ability to define separate
> output paths for midi and .ps/pdf files.
>
> Currently, the -o option does not allow to output midi files in a
> separate directory.
As a first step, wouldn't it suffice to have a wrapper:
lilypond $1
mv $1.midi dir
and if you are using makefiles, lilypond don't have to solve that
problem, you could just as easily add an mv-line in the makefile.
Well, the same goes for the midi vs. mid problem I guess.
Regards,
/Karl
- initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], (continued)
- Re: initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
Karl Hammar <=
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), fiëé visuëlle, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), fiëé visuëlle, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/16