[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: *.mid vs *.midi
|
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
|
Subject: |
Re: *.mid vs *.midi |
|
Date: |
Sun, 18 May 2008 10:34:09 +0200 |
2008/5/18 Karl Hammar <address@hidden>:
> and if you are using makefiles, lilypond don't have to solve that
> problem, you could just as easily add an mv-line in the makefile.
If we all were using makefiles (including the newbies on Win32), then
we wouldn't be having this discussion at all :-)
Cheers,
Valentin
- Re: initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], (continued)
- Re: initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Bertalan Fodor, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: initial .ly files [was Re: *.mid vs *.midi], Hans Aberg, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Valentin Villenave, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Karl Hammar, 2008/05/17
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi,
Valentin Villenave <=
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), fiëé visuëlle, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), fiëé visuëlle, 2008/05/18
- Re: launch scripts (was: *.mid vs *.midi), Hans Aberg, 2008/05/18
- Re: *.mid vs *.midi, Hans Aberg, 2008/05/16