lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rests position in otherwise empty measure.txt


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: rests position in otherwise empty measure.txt
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 23:19:55 +0200
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.5)

If you search for "rests" in the LSR, http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it, you will find an example called "Merging rests automatically, which contains some code that you can copy verbatim to your own file and then use as described at the top of the file (click on the typeset music in the example, to see the code).

  /Mats

Quoting Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>:

Bill

I don't really know the answer to your question, whether the LP default positioning for whole measure rests in polyphonic music follows standard typesetting practice, although I know it was always the intention to do so. So I'm copying this to the -user list to prompt comment from those more knowledgeable than I about such things.

Trevor

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Mooney" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 11:33 PM
Subject: Re: rests position in otherwise empty measure.txt


Hi Trevor,
Your solution, and one other slightly different one I found in an earlier post, fixes the positioning 'problem' for whole measure rests but doesn't affect the smaller rests (obviously!). I suppose what I'm asking is, when one has two voices on a single staff is it standard notation practice for the WMRs to be positioned the way LP defaults. My 'client' doesn't like the LP way, unfortunately, hence my attempts at a general workaround.

Thank you for your help
Bill




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user








reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]