|
From: | Arjan Bos |
Subject: | Re: substitution with \movement |
Date: | Wed, 11 Jun 2008 13:21:39 +0200 |
I'm sure we've all had that feeling. Starting of with typesetting a simple melody and then enhancing the lay-out bit by bit until the notes are buried underneath a stack of lay-out commands. I do my best to separate lay-out from content, but there are situations where this is either not possible (like in fingering instructions) or not advisable (like with the dynamics). Opening up one of my guitar scores, I am daunted by the fact that it looks so complicated that I need lots of comments not to get lost.
I am fully aware that it will be a lot of work on the developers side to implement this. But please consider it. Let it burn on the back- stove for a while, let it stew and when you are ready, please consider implementing it. It would make the source-code of our nice looking scores so much simpler to read. (And yes, I did consider doing it myself, but I'm more a COBOL-guy ;-) )
Kind regards, Arjan On 11 jun 2008, at 12:33, Valentin Villenave wrote:
2008/6/11 Stefan Thomas <address@hidden>:But unfortunately this doesn't work: langsamer = { \movement "subito meno mosso" "4" #69 }You have to add a # before each quoted string: langsamer = { \movement #"subito meno mosso" #"4" #69 } It's in order to tell the Scheme interpreter: "hey, wake up! Here's a string for you!" Cheers, Valentin _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |