Re: LSR search is broken

[Werner LEMBERG]

> > Seriously... is one-indexing the LSR code (which is clearly
> > zero-indexed) difficult for some reason?  In all the programming
> > I've done — including Java, etc. — I've found reindexing to be
> > fairly easy, in general...
> 
> One-indexing is brain damaged. See EWD831:
> http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/transcriptions/EWD08xx/EWD831.html

This might be true for Mathematics, but not for `real' life: If there
are four items lying on the table, and you have to enumerate them,
most people will call them item 1 to item 4, and *not* item 0 to
item 3.  Please change this.


    Werner