Re: second public draft, NR 2.2 Keyboard instruments

[Trevor Daniels]

Looks pretty good.  I have only really trivial comments:

* References for keyboards

Missing comma:
"PianoStaff group and third, normal staff for the pedals."
                                  ,

The sentence:
"This section discusses notation techniques particular to keyboard music."
would be better right at the top.

* Changing staff automatically

In the second example the voice would be better
named "melody" to help non-English speakers.

* Piano pedals

Last sentence:
"Pedalling to the final bar line is indicated by omitting the final pedal up 
command." -> " ... omitting the final @code{\sustainOff} command."

Also "pedalling" is the English spelling :)

(Incidentally, these pedalling commands, \unaCorde, \treCorde, etc mean the 
proposed \ottava command is not the only one which does not use English.)

Trevor



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
To: "lilypond-user Mailinglist" <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:53 AM
Subject: GDP: second public draft, NR 2.2 Keyboard instruments


> I'm happy to announce the second public draft of NR 2.2 Keyboard
> instruments.  This is the last time to (easily) get fixes
> included, so please read it and ask about anything that's unclear,
> incorrect, or missing.
>
> As always, you can find it from following the GDP output links
> here:
> http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user