[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: collision problem
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: collision problem |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:57:06 +0100 |
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, August 28, 2008 1:18 PM
Oh, if you haven't carefully read NR 6, that might be good... although
it hasn't been touched yet, so I don't know if Trevor wants to hear
about any problems you find in it. That's up to him...
It will be quite a while before I get to NR 6, but I
could always file comments away for when I do. Actually,
Keiren, comments on LM App B and the leap into NR 6 would
also be useful. Actually, revised text written to clarify
any obscure points as you learn would be far better than
comments. That's how I wrote most of the LM. Plain text
in an email would be fine - I can easily format it for the
docs.
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- Re: collision problem, (continued)
- Re: collision problem, James E. Bailey, 2008/08/18
- collision problem, James E. Bailey, 2008/08/27
- Re: collision problem, Neil Puttock, 2008/08/27
- Re: collision problem, James E. Bailey, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Graham Percival, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Mats Bengtsson, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Graham Percival, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Kieren MacMillan, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem, Graham Percival, 2008/08/28
- Re: collision problem,
Trevor Daniels <=