[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Removing bundled LilyPond
From: |
Reinhold Kainhofer |
Subject: |
Re: Removing bundled LilyPond |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Sep 2008 01:41:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 24. September 2008 schrieb Alexander Kobel:
> On the other hand, I'm not absolutely sure whether lilypond requires
> additional paths for, say, scheme scripts or other input files to be
> set;
No, the --relocate command-line option passed in the ~/bin/lilypond will take
care of this and tell lilypond that it should not look into the default
pathes, but check directories relative to the actual lilypond binary.
> A recent thread showed that the LilyPond people are
> not even absolutely clear on whether it actually needs a LaTeX
> distribution or not...
;-) Well, in general lilypond does not need a latex distribution. However,
lilypond-book needs it when called with a latex file (which is not the most
typical use of lilypond).
Cheers,
Reinhold
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
* K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
* Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFI2tA9TqjEwhXvPN0RAjRZAJ9X11cyTDEz+xClcUTOVnlUVZ6R7wCgoEvW
R/yj6v+YRnzceiouBWZjxrY=
=qv3k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Removing bundled LilyPond, (continued)