lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: horizontally centering denominator in compound time signatures


From: Reinhold Kainhofer
Subject: Re: horizontally centering denominator in compound time signatures
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:50:41 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27-9-generic; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; )

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am Sonntag, 30. November 2008 17:30:06 schrieb Neil Puttock:
> 2008/11/30 Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden>:
> > It seems that make-center*-markup only sets the correct extents to the
> > right, but not to the left (which is apparently set to 0...).
> >
> >> but you can probably work around it by
> >> setting X-offset manually.
>
> Try this:
>
> \override Staff.Clef #'(space-alist time-signature) = #'(extra-space . 1.2)

It's actually not a problem of spacing between the clef and the time 
signature, but rather a problem with make-center-column-markup, which ignores 
the left extents. for example, it also breaks for 2/4 + (2+3)/8. The second 
fraction will overlap with the first +, because the extents left to the center 
of the (2+3)/8 fraction will be totally ignored. In other words, the center of 
the (3+2)/8 fraction will be where its left edge should be...

So, this is a general problem with the general-column scheme function...

Cheers,
Reinhold
- -- 
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, Vienna University of Technology, Austria
email: address@hidden, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
 * Financial and Actuarial Mathematics, TU Wien, http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/
 * K Desktop Environment, http://www.kde.org, KOrganizer maintainer
 * Chorvereinigung "Jung-Wien", http://www.jung-wien.at/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFJMsRhTqjEwhXvPN0RAjl5AJ9qpb2sXXio4JmGo3G0/fkJ7PfJJwCghakl
qSTIi7oSXjK2xnAF85MnyNE=
=E6Td
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]