Re: Move slur for acciaccatura

[James E. Bailey]

Am 01.01.2009 um 11:59 schrieb Nick Payne:

> I'm using 2.12.0. I'm now wondering if it's due to using single staff
> polyphony with two voices. In the bars with acciaccatura I have no  
> notes in
> the bass voice for several bars at that point and so have \repeat  
> unfold 4 {
> s2. }. Maybe the slur is being moved to avoid the silent note. Any  
> way to
> avoid that?
Yes. \oneVoice. The automatic << { } \\ { } >> construct inserts  
implicit \voiceOne, \voiceTwo, \voiceThree, etc. in the respective  
voices. You can manually set \oneVoice at your discretion. You may  
want to re-read NR 1.5.2 Explicitly instantiating voices.

> Nick
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: James E. Bailey [mailto:address@hidden
> > Sent: Thursday, 1 January 2009 21:16
> > To: Nick Payne
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: Move slur for acciaccatura
> >
> >
> > Am 01.01.2009 um 10:48 schrieb Nick Payne:
> >
> > > The slurs on the acciaccaturas in my score are all defaulting to
> > > above the
> > > stems of the grace notes, even when the grace notes are on or above
> > > the
> > > middle of the stave and their stems are up. How can I move the
> > > slurs to
> > > appear beneath. I tried using
> > >
> > >                         \once \override PhrasingSlur #'direction = #DOWN
> > >                         \acciaccatura { d16[ e16] } d8 c\> d2\! ~
> > >
> > > But I still get the slur above, as shown in the attached PNG
> >
> > Actually, I don't get the slurs above regardless. Using acciaccatura
> > or appoggiatura. Which version are you using?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user