Re: Suggestion for Notation Reference

[Jonathan Kulp]

Lasse Rempe wrote:
> > How about "(Reprise)", which is similar to the structural indications 
> > that the \mark command is meant for? Image attached.  If this looks 
> > o.k. then I'll make the patch.
>
> I will reiterate my opinion that, in the attached snippet, a reader 
> would interpret the text to correspond to the beginning of the second 
> bar, whereas logically in the lilypond file it would come _after_ the 
> first note. Am I the only one who thinks it is not clean to document 
> this as a standard solution?
I don't know.  This is definitely a strange example.  The \mark command 
is meant to insert something over a barline, so maybe it'd be best to 
delete this example altogether and reword things a bit so that the 
example with "colla parte" is the only one illustrating this feature.

Jon

--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com