Re: \crescTextCresc... 2.10 vs 2.12

[Trevor Daniels]

Frédéric

You are quite right.

I think what was finally done in 2.11 and 2.12 was to make \crescTextCresc 
set crescencii persistently to text and \cresc do a once-only text 
crescendo.   There is a similar symmetry between

dimTextDim (persists) and \dim (once only)

but not between

\dimTextDecresc  and \decresc
\dimTextDecr  and \decr

because \decr is a synonym for \> and \decresc seems not to have been 
implemented.  This seems a pity, as the symmetry is broken.  Perhaps this 
should be corrected in 2.13.

The docs for 2.12 don't mention \cresc or \dim.  This could (should) be 
fixed now.

Trevor


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Frédéric Bron" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2009 6:53 PM
Subject: Re: \crescTextCresc... 2.10 vs 2.12


> Actually, it's the other way round: \setTextCresc was documented (and 
> meant)
> to apply only to the next crescendo, although in reality it was never 
> reset
> and its effect continued for all following crescendi. This behavior was 
> fixed
> in 2.12 and the effect now really only applies to the next crescendo as
> documented.

\setTextCresc worked very well for me in 2.10.33 on the next cresc only.
However with 2.12.2 (Windows), the following gives 2 times cresc:
{ \crescTextCresc c'2\< d'\! c'\< d'\! }

Frédéric


_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user