|
| From: | M Watts |
| Subject: | Re: yet another chord question |
| Date: | Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:38:00 +1000 |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081105) |
Brett Duncan wrote:
Because c:9+ would be the chord <c e g bes dis> rather than <c e g b dis>, so it doesn't match your chord definition.
Indeed; changing to <c e g bes dis> in the OP example works.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |