[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Total invisibility
From: |
Gilles Sadowski |
Subject: |
Re: Total invisibility |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:17:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
>> E.g. in this instance, I would have liked to keep the drone notes and
>> the
>> melody notes together (i.e. in the same file) because they both are
>> the
>> bagpipe "content".
>> But that, as we've seen, that makes it difficult to separate the
>> printed
>> from the midi output; hence I had to *separate* contents that belong
>> together (i.e. create the "drone" staff) and then use "\tag"...
> No, that's not true. There's a difference between having them in the
> same file, and having them in the variable. You can have a variable
> drone = {music} and a variable pipes = {music} in the same file.
I had exactly that: 2 _variables_.
> And
> then your score has \new Staff <<\drone \pipes>> or not.
I cannot have that (i.e. it's a personal choice to minimize the number of
changes from one project to another) because the "Staff" is exported from
the "contents" file: Hence at the score level, I just want to see a variable
"\staves" (which is a "StaffGroup"); but no reference to the internal
"drone" or "pipes".
Admittedly, there might be a better way to organize the layout/contents into
multiple files but if I'm not mistaken, there is a huge gap between the
examples in the manual or LSR (where everything is crammed into a single
file) and frameworks for large scale projects. [Some proposals have been
talked about in this ML (e.g. Nicolas Sceaux's) but they are not (yet?)
integral part of LilyPond.]
In-between these extremes, there are many different aproaches, but not one
considered to be the final "normalized" LilyPond template of templates...
Best,
Gilles
- Total invisibility, Gilles Sadowski, 2009/02/17
- RE: Total invisibility, Ed Ardzinski, 2009/02/17
- Re: Total invisibility, James E. Bailey, 2009/02/17
- Re: Total invisibility, Gilles Sadowski, 2009/02/17
- Re: Total invisibility, James E. Bailey, 2009/02/17
- Re: Total invisibility, Gilles Sadowski, 2009/02/18
- Re: Total invisibility, James E. Bailey, 2009/02/18
- Re: Total invisibility, Gilles Sadowski, 2009/02/19
- Re: Total invisibility, James E. Bailey, 2009/02/20
- Re: Total invisibility,
Gilles Sadowski <=
- Re: Total invisibility, Neil Thornock, 2009/02/20
- Re: Total invisibility, Gilles Sadowski, 2009/02/20
- Re: Total invisibility, Neil Thornock, 2009/02/20