lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: missing feature? piano hand brackets


From: Mats Bengtsson
Subject: Re: missing feature? piano hand brackets
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:27:11 +0100
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070716)



Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
First can be easily achieved with a postscript markup. (Two straight lines)
Is Postscript easier than the built-in markup commands?
\markup{\concat{ \draw-line #'(0 . 3) \draw-line #'(1 . 0)}}
The tricky part is to automatically get correct the length and position. The way I would approach the problem would be to implement my own Scheme function that can be used to override the Arpeggio #'stencil property. The built-in stencil functions for the different possible layouts for arpeggio are implemented in C++, but I think you can extract the same information from the
Arpeggio object using Scheme.

   /Mats

till Rettig wrote:
Hi,

from the German LilyPond-Forum (at http://www.lilypondforum.de/index.php?topic=234.0): In Piano music it is some times important to indicat that a note written in one staff should be played by the hand of the other staff. This is mostly done by a l-shaped bracket pointing towards the staff where the note should belong to.

See the attached pictures (first is hand drawn, second from Scriabin Sonate 10.

Greetings
Till




_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        School of Electrical Engineering
        Royal Institute of Technology (KTH)
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
       Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]