[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: auto-beaming
From: |
Carl D. Sorensen |
Subject: |
Re: auto-beaming |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:27:51 -0600 |
On 3/19/09 5:13 AM, "Mats Bengtsson" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Trevor Daniels wrote:
>> Unfortunately, this will also subdivide 16th beams too. This is what
>> I meant by "not quite possible". You would need to turn
>> subdivideBeams on and off as required.
> Should we turn this into feature request to make the automatic
> subdivision of beams even more flexible, with separate rules for
> different note lengths, or would the resulting scheme get too messy to
> use and implement?
>
It seems to me that this should be a feature request.
It also seems to me that we could make this quite easy to use as a default.
We currently have beatGrouping used to end beams and beatLength used to
subdivide beams.
If we want more control over ending beams, we use override-auto-beam-setting
to add beam endings for specific beam types (16th, 32ned, etc.)
We should be able to add a functionality for override-beam-subdivision that
is beam type specific, just like we've done for beam endings. Although it
may be somewhat hard to get just right, the documentation is in *much*
better shape than it used to be (thanks, Trevor), and we can use a
corresponding syntax so it must only be learned once.
Also, for the most common settings, beatGrouping and beatLength suffice; no
need for any of the overrides.
Carl
- auto-beaming, David Bobroff, 2009/03/19
- Re: auto-beaming, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/19
- Re: auto-beaming, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/03/19
- Re: auto-beaming,
Carl D. Sorensen <=
- Re: auto-beaming, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/03/19
- Re: auto-beaming, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/03/19
- Re: auto-beaming, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/19
- Re: auto-beaming, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/03/19
- Re: auto-beaming, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/19
- Re: auto-beaming, Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/03/20
- Re: auto-beaming, M Watts, 2009/03/21
- Re: auto-beaming, Trevor Daniels, 2009/03/21