[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: default margins
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: default margins |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:04:29 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Graham Percival
> A priori, I would say that changing margins are **not** a good
> idea... but since professional typesetters do it, and I never
> noticed myself in 25 years of music-playing, I have to admit that
> maybe it's a good idea.
Graham,
I don't get the sense that professional typesetters changed
margins **intentionally**. I assume it had to do with the
mechanical process. As an example, I've read that some
measurements were traditionally taken by swinging a compass
back and forth across a page...
Your idea is intriguing, but personally I'm not in favor of
it.
If you're curious, check out "Music Engraving and Printing"
by William Gamble, pp.117-123 (some images are removed in the
online preview):
http://books.google.com/books?id=bNqRxyCTO7AC&printsec=frontcover&cad=0#PPA120,M1
Regarding paper-size/printed-matter proportions, p.115
of the same book has a sampling of measurements from
several unnamed English music pubishers (the book was
written in 1923):
http://books.google.com/books?id=bNqRxyCTO7AC&printsec=frontcover&cad=0#PPA115,M1
Hope this helps.
- Mark
- default margins, Pekka Siponen, 2009/03/18
- Re: default margins,
Mark Polesky <=