Re: LilyPond, Finale and Sibelius

[Valentin Villenave]

2009/4/6 Trevor Daniels <address@hidden>:
>> The 'q' version to my eyes is a bit easier to read.
>
> As I do little note entry myself I don't have a view
> on the merits of q vs &, but there is another issue to
> consider.  If the base chord being repeated contains
> tweaks, fingering, etc, are these to be repeated too?

That's an interesting question. I think it would be wiser to repeat
only the notes (the only other thing that could have to be repeated
would be staccato dots, for instance, but this can be handled through
Scheme functions).

Werner: on an AZERTY french keyboard, you don't need to press shift to
type "&", that is why I proposed it in the first place :-)

That being said, `q' for [kord] makes sense to me (though in a geeky
way), so I withdraw my question :)

Regards,
Valentin