[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: date in footer?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: date in footer? |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:31:28 +0100 |
2009/4/25 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:22:56AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 4/25/09 9:37 AM, "Neil Puttock" <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > 2009/4/23 Jonathan Kulp <address@hidden>:
>> >> Graham Percival wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> 1. Log in to LSR as an editor. (I remember the discussion now;
>> >>> this isn't your fault)
>> >>>
>> >>> 2. Find the "tags" section for each snippet.
>> >>>
>> >>> 3. Click on the drop-down menus, and select the relevant tags.
>> >>>
>> >>> 4. There is no #4.
>> >>
>> >> Is "save" #4?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the rundown, Graham. As you've said, this is very easy and I
>> >> figured it out myself as reported in previous email...
>> >
>> > 4. Note that one of the snippets isn't tagged as `docs', which means
>> > it's in input/new.
>> >
>> > 5. Find the snippet in input/new, and add the tag there instead.
>> >
>> > 6. Scratch #5, since the snippet shouldn't be in input/new in the first
>> > place.
>
> Those steps 4-6 are when you're looking at git. My steps 1-4
> (including the "save snippet") are strictly for LSR stuff, which
> is all that I'm claiming is trivial. I would *never* claim that
> git is trivial.
Perhaps the point I was trying to make got lost in my slightly
facetious reply: if we're talking about LSR snippets which are in the
docs, the LSR editor must be mindful of the fact that editing such
examples in LSR may have no effect, since they can be shadowed by
revised snippets in input/lsr.
There's no point in retagging `Outputting the version number' in LSR
if it's going to be ignored when makelsr.py is run.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: date in footer?, (continued)
- Re: date in footer?, Martin Tarenskeen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23