[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: date in footer?
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: date in footer? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:16:33 +0100 |
2009/4/26 Graham Percival <address@hidden>:
> This is easily solved; the python script that copies from
> input/new/ to input/lsr/ should add a "This snippet only works in
> 2.13"; that way, the LSR editor can easily see such snippets from
> browsing the docs.
We already have a comment which says where the snippets come from,
even if it doesn't explain why a particular example has been generated
from input/new. If we're going to expand on this message, I'd like it
to be based on \version, i.e., "This snippet only works from version
x.y.z".
Regards,
Neil
- Re: date in footer?, (continued)
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/25
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/26
- Re: date in footer?,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Neil Puttock, 2009/04/28
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Graham Percival, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Carl D. Sorensen, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Jonathan Kulp, 2009/04/23
- Re: date in footer?, Chip, 2009/04/23