lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Missing ties between chords


From: Marc Hohl
Subject: Re: Missing ties between chords
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:15:25 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090318)

Neil Puttock schrieb:
2009/5/17 Marc Hohl <address@hidden>:

But there is another voice played on the guitar, so I decided to declare my
bit as \voiceOne.
One tie is gone, but this seems to be okay (or should there still be four
ties? - second line).

There are still four ties, but two are printed in overstrike; you can
confirm this by tweaking 'tie-configuration:

\override TieColumn #'tie-configuration = #'((-3 . 1) (-1 . 1) (1 . 1) (4 . 1))
Okay.
When I want to remove the numbers that are following a tie, I use a function
\override Tie #'after-line-breaking = #tie::handle-tab-tie
which is not perfect yet, but for ties in the same staff line, it works, but
as you can see
on the fourth line, one tie isn't recognized properly, but this seems to be
the case only with
two equal notes, because when I change one b to an a

\relative c { < fis\4 a\3 b\2 e\1 >2 ~ < fis\4 a\3 b\2 e\1 > }

there are still only _three_ ties in the normal staff, but the tab numbers
disappear without complaining.

This appears to be a limitation of how the Tie_engraver sets the
spanner bounds: if there are ties between unisons in the same voice,
the right bound is the same notehead.  For normal noteheads, this
naturally makes sense, since the ties are between the two inner notes.
So there is no way to change this behaviour (at least in an easy way)?
Then I have to clear the surious number manually.

Thank you!

Marc
Regards,
Neil






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]