[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tempo mark alignment
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: Tempo mark alignment |
Date: |
Wed, 27 May 2009 21:01:16 +0100 |
2009/5/24 Jay Anderson <address@hidden>:
> What are the issues with Neil's patch? I've been playing around with
> it and it seems to do what I want. Well, it's a similar patch really
> (see attached).
With your amended patch, it's no longer possible to align tempo marks
to note columns; they behave just like rehearsal marks.
> How often is a situation like this encountered (not that I really
> understand what it means)? The most common usage (tempo mark on the
> bar) works fine.Perhaps if it can't be worked out we could create a
> patch that works in 99% of cases and leave an enhancement open to work
> on the other cases later.
Adding the context property to switch between the two alignments was a
quick hack with a serious limitation: if set to align with note
columns, tempo marks disappear completely when attached to
multi-measure rests.
A proper solution should be able to determine automatically when to
attach the tempo mark to prefatory material (favouring time
signatures) or note columns.
Regards,
Neil
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), (continued)
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Valentin Villenave, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Ari Torhamo, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Ari Torhamo, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Tim McNamara, 2009/05/23
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Graham Percival, 2009/05/24
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Tim McNamara, 2009/05/24
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Anthony W. Youngman, 2009/05/24
- Re: Users versus developers (was: Tempo mark alignment), Graham Percival, 2009/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: Tempo mark alignment, Jay Anderson, 2009/05/23
- Re: Tempo mark alignment,
Neil Puttock <=
- Re: Tempo mark alignment, Andrew Hawryluk, 2009/05/28
- Re: Tempo mark alignment, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2009/05/29
Re: Tempo mark alignment, Valentin Villenave, 2009/05/23