Re: new website draft 5: help wanted, I mean it

[Jonathan Kulp]

Graham Percival wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 12:21:17PM -0700, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 2:41 AM, Graham
> > Percival<address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > Although I'm not fond of JavaScript, I think the solution here is
> > > > called thickbox:
> > > > http://jquery.com/demo/thickbox/
> > > No javascript.  Besides, the display isn't the issue; what's at
> > > issue is generating the images in an automatic, system-independent
> > > way.  (as in "not what's in the current makefile and examples/ dir")
> > Valentin, I've never used jquery before, but if you can implement
> > this, and the site is still functional with scripting *disabled*, then
> > I think we should definitely use it.
>
> Ok, but the important questions still remain:
> 1.  Do we want to display *different* images after a click, or just
> *expanded* images?

I vote for expanded images, not different ones, just so people can 
see them at a higher resolution and see how nice they look.

> 2.  Is this an important feature?  (if so, we can't use
> javascript)
> 3.  Who's going to create the .ly files, write the makefile, etc?
>
>
> If the first two answers are "no, no", then I'll do the third.
>
> Cheers,
> - Graham


--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com