Re: markup help

[Carl Sorensen]

On 8/14/09 12:27 PM, "James E. Bailey" <address@hidden> wrote:

> 
> On 14.08.2009, at 19:11, Carl Sorensen wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/14/09 9:54 AM, "James E. Bailey" <address@hidden> wrote:
>> 
>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Though I reorganized them for 2.13. Hopefully you'll find this
>>>> version easier to read:
>>>> http://kainhofer.com/~lilypond/Documentation/notation/index_54.html
>>>> 
>>>> - Mark
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>> 
>>> Thank you, incidentally, after some trial and error (after I sent the email)
>>> >> I
>>> figured that out. Although I should point out, neither documentation source
>>> says that the glyph names for the numbers don't begin with "scripts".
>>> 
>>>  
>> 
>> The list of all glyphs says the numbers are "one", "two", etc.  The fermatas
>> are "scripts.ufermata", "scripts.dfermata", etc.
>> 
>> Where does this imply that the numbers should be "scripts.one", not "one"?
>> How could we make the documentation clearer?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> 
>> Carl
>> 
>>  
> 
> 
> No problems, in the 2.12 documentation, b.6 The Feta font. The first sentence
> there is:
> The following symbols are available in the Emmentaler font and may be accessed
> directly using text markup such as g^\markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.segno" },
> see Formatting text.
> 
> In the one on kainhofer it's section a.6 The Feta font:
> The following symbols are available in the Emmentaler font and may be accessed
> directly using text markup such as g^\markup { \musicglyph #"scripts.segno" },
> see Formatting text.
> 

OK, I've tried to be more clear by referencing the glyph names "as shown in
the table below", and I've included two examples: the current segno example
and one that uses five.

The fix is now pushed to git.

Thanks

Carl