lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: quality of lilypond outputs of different WYSIWIG software


From: Thomas Bonte
Subject: Re: quality of lilypond outputs of different WYSIWIG software
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:24:40 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Daryna,

There is always the possibility to export your work in MuseScore to MusicXML
and import it in Lilypond. The MusicXML export for MuseScore is very
accurate and I believe Reinhold did a very good job with the import. So
certainly something to try out.


Daryna Baikadamova wrote:
> 
> There are many WYSIWIG software capable of opening and saving lilypond
> files, such as MuseScore, Denemo and Canorus.  However what are the
> quality of their Lilypond inputs and outputs?
> 
> Also when we talk about "quality", we often mean the accuracy, how
> well the features are preserved, and how easy for a *human* to read
> and manually maintain the Lilypond output in the future.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Daryna
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/quality-of-lilypond-outputs-of-different-WYSIWIG-software-tp24793553p25038449.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]