[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals
From: |
Kees van den Doel |
Subject: |
Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:06:08 -0700 |
> > > these programs operate as you describe
> >
> > Okay, then they *do* use (essentially) the same method as Lilypond,
> > not some "visually-oriented" method which "follows the key
> signature"...>
>
> Not so. In Sibelius, you put the key signature, e.g. F sharp
> major, then
> type
> the plain letter names, e.g. f g a b c d e f which plays back as
> the scale
I was talking about MIDI keyboard entry.
> of F sharp major. The Lilypond method seems a bit odd to start with,
> but "es" and "is" are easily typed. What's the point of
> quibbling over it.
> As Graham says, the coders got there first.
>
> > So is there *any* example of an application which tries to "follow
> > the key signature" for someone?
> >
> Yes - Sibelius.
ABC too. And I never liked it.
Kees