Re: Articulate midi script

[Grammostola Rosea]

Peter Chubb wrote:
> > > > > > "Grammostola" == Grammostola Rosea <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > > >             
>
>
> Grammostola> But I got this message:
>
> Grammostola> address@hidden:~/lilypondfiles$ lilywrap lilywraptest.ly
> Grammostola> /usr/local/lilypond/usr/bin/lilypond: unrecognized
> Grammostola> option: `--midi'
>
>
> Here's an updated lilywrap script.
>
> You don't actually have to use lilywrap: all it does is insert
>  \include "articulate.ly"
>  near the top of the file, and insert
>
> \unfoldRepeats \articulate
>
> around the main part of the score.  In fact, in the general case,
> you're better off adding it all by hand --- especially if there is
> anything between the \score{ and the first bit of real music.
>
>   
Thanks!

@ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could improve the midi output by 
default. I can remember I mentioned this before, but one comment (not 
from you) was that Lilypond was mainly a notation typesetter... And 
while been busy with the lilywrap script, I was thinking, ok maybe 
that's right, but what is wrong with having both, e.g. good lay-out and 
good midi output?

Regards,

\r