[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New user question - relative bowing and fingering marks
From: |
Valentin Villenave |
Subject: |
Re: New user question - relative bowing and fingering marks |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Sep 2009 12:55:34 +0200 |
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen<address@hidden> wrote:
> It looks like you may have found a bug. LilyPond should format
> stuff correctly, if she produces atypical results we should
> check our references and teach her, rather than look for tweaks.
(CCing to bug-)
> So...looking for references on this is not so easy. Stone doesn't
> say anything, Reed doesn't, Ross merely states that "probably no
> two experienced engravers will always" [place fingering in the same
> spot], but notes that "when accents are used [] with fingerings,
> the accents take their normal positions and fingerings are placed
> either abover or below [] according to the available space.
>
> Now...are bowing instructions accents?
>
> I'm attaching two scans of Baerenreiter's solo cello suite, that
> show they agree with you on the placement. I propose to fix
> this if we cannot find better [contradicting] references.
>
>> As an aside the glyph used for upbow doesn't look consistent with the
>> rest of the glyph set. Typically the left hand side of the 'V' is
>> darker than the right. The glyph in use doesn't seem to match the
>> downbow glyph.
>
> I think you are mistaken here. The upbow glyph (see scans)
> that I know invarably is symmetric.
>
>
> Greetings,
> Jan.
beer1.png
Description: PNG image
beer2-small.png
Description: PNG image