[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Contemporary music documentation
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Contemporary music documentation |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Sep 2009 01:54:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 10:08:02PM +0100, Neil Puttock wrote:
> 2009/9/4 Carl Sorensen <address@hidden>:
>
> > setInstrumentName =
> > #(define-music-function (parser location instrument-name) (string?)
> > #{
> > \set Staff.instrumentName = $instrument-name
> > #})
>
> I'm not in favour of this type of substitution function; I hope it's
> not indicative of the kind of approach we'll be pursuing in GLISS.
It's not necessarily the approach we'd be pursuing. We haven't
decided what approach to take, precisely, and we *won't* even be
starting that discussion for another week or two.
If that copyright fuss hadn't been started, I might have initiated
the discussion it this weekend. But as it is, we've already used
up half of Septembrer's quota for huge non-work discussions.
> Apart from cluttering the source with syntactic sugar constructs, this
> hard-codes inflexibility which is detrimental to users' understanding
> of LilyPond. We already have too many predefined commands which rely
> on particular contexts; imagine a user wanting to set an instrument
> name for a PianoStaff: the above is useless in this situation.
Those are extremely good points. In the interests of a full
discussion (on a separate mailist, to avoid cluttering -devel),
I'm not going to announce that we *won't* do this kind of thing,
but unless the proponents of such an approach have terrifically
good reasons to counter or override the above, I can't imagine
going ahead with it.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, (continued)
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Joseph Wakeling, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Joseph Wakeling, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Trevor Daniels, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Joseph Wakeling, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/05
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Trevor Daniels, 2009/09/05
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/06
- Re: Contemporary music documentation,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Valentin Villenave, 2009/09/12
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/13
Re: Contemporary music documentation, Valentin Villenave, 2009/09/04
Re: Contemporary music documentation, Mark Polesky, 2009/09/04