[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Contemporary music documentation
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: Contemporary music documentation |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:13:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:37:37AM +0200, Valentin Villenave wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Graham Percival
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Those are extremely good points. In the interests of a full
> > discussion (on a separate mailist, to avoid cluttering -devel),
>
> May I suggest http://lists.lilynet.net/proposals/ ?
No, you may not. Unless you think I'm a total idiot and that I've
forgotten the initial planning/discussion that happened a few
weeks ago. And that I failed to save any interesting emails from
that discussion for later reviewing.
Cheers,
- Graham
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, (continued)
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Carl Sorensen, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/04
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Trevor Daniels, 2009/09/05
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Neil Puttock, 2009/09/06
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Graham Percival, 2009/09/11
- Re: Contemporary music documentation, Valentin Villenave, 2009/09/12
- Re: Contemporary music documentation,
Graham Percival <=
Re: Contemporary music documentation, Valentin Villenave, 2009/09/04
Re: Contemporary music documentation, Mark Polesky, 2009/09/04