Re: No fiddling claim

[Jonathan Wilkes]

> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:47:44 +0200
> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: No fiddling claim
> To: Jonathan Wilkes <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> Op maandag 28-09-2009 om 10:33 uur [tijdzone -0700],
> schreef Jonathan
> Wilkes:
> 
> >      I don't understand the meaning of
> the statement "More often than not 
> > it isn't."
> 
> What I meant to say is that certain tweaks are
> fundamentally
> not automatable.  However, in many cases  we
> should expect
> lilypond to do the right thing and if she doesn't, strive
> to make it so.

That sounds good to me.

> 
> > For example, in Op. 53 in NR 1.1:
> 
> Link please?
> 
> I do not see anything you mention here
>     http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/notation/Pitches#Pitches

Yep, that's it.  Right underneath The heading "1.1 Pitches", there's a 
dotted line, then two systems from a Beethoven Sonata with a green 
border around it.

-Jonathan

> 
> 
> Jan.