lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: modern accidentals rule


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: modern accidentals rule
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:25:07 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Carl Sorensen <address@hidden> writes:

> On 11/9/09 5:58 PM, "Hudson Flávio Meneses Lacerda"
>> 
>> BTW, I have found a strange behaviour of "modern" accidentals rule:
>> LilyPond considers volta alternatives as "previous" measure. Is this
>> correct? (Note the natural sign at the 2nd and 3rd alternatives, not
>> related to the previous _played_ measure.)
>
> I do not know.  I am not an expert on the different accidental rules,
> nor on the standard engraving practices for accidentals in
> alternatives.  But I would expect that the last measure of the repeat
> should serve as the previous measure for each of the alternatives.

And it should serve as the previous measure for starting ties and slurs
and key and meter changes.  And the first measure of the repeat should
serve as the following measure for unfinished ties and slurs for all of
the alternatives except the last one (which means that tie and slur
directions should match and the tie/slur should extend to the bar line
rather than trigger an error).

-- 
David Kastrup





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]