[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: developers developers developers
From: |
Tim Reeves |
Subject: |
Re: developers developers developers |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:55:08 -0800 |
Graham wrote:
>
> For the record, **I have never recommended that somebody use
> lilypond**. When meeting a technically-oriented composer,
> especially one working on algorithmic music, I might suggest that
> they should check it out. But I think the original poster was
> entirely justified in switching back to Finale.
>
> That's why I cringe a bit whenever I hear people proudly
> announcing that they advertized lilypond to meeting X or
> conference Y.
>
I'm surprised. What about the beautiful output and flexibility? If they
don't like the learning curve, what's the loss?
For me, I only use it for stuff that doesn't require much, if any,
tweaking, but from the gist of what I read on the user list, maybe I'm in
the minority.
Tim Reeves
- Re: developers developers developers,
Tim Reeves <=