Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 84, Issue 102

2009/11/24 <address@hidden>

Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
address@hidden

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden

You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. Re:\set vs \override (Francisco Vila)
2. Re:another problem with partcombine (David Kastrup)
3. Re:another problem with partcombine (Wilbert Berendsen)
4. Re:\set vs \override (Nick Payne)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:09:41 +0100
From: Francisco Vila <paconet.org@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: \set vs \override
To: address@hidden
Cc: David Kastrup <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Message-ID:
<address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

2009/11/24 Han-Wen Nienhuys <address@hidden>:
> I think you send a lot of mail. I suggest reading code; if it were
> easy, where would the fun be?

Sorry if it sounds angry. My humble opinion is that it's absolutely
NOT FUN to have a future without LilyPond because reading the code was
not easy enough.

> As a hint:

Every hint is immensely appreciated, of course. I agree in that
labyrinths are fun to solve, but not if that means the project running
out of developers and especially if somebody knows the path.

Sorry again, I had to say it.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org
www.csmbadajoz.com

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:31:03 +0100
From: David Kastrup <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: another problem with partcombine
To: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Stefan Thomas <address@hidden> writes:

> Dear community,
> I've got another problem with partcombine.
> Is there a possibilitie to force lilypond to print the following (whithin the
> partcombine-command) in tow different voices?
> \version "2.12.2"
>
> upper = \relative c' {
> r8 c e g e c
> }
> lower = \relative c' {
> c4 r2
> }
>
> all ={ \new Staff { \partcombine \upper \lower } }
> \score { \all }

That does not sound like you want the parts combined after all. Maybe
something like

<< { \upper } \\ { \lower } >>

is what you want rather than \partcombine \upper \lower ?

--
David Kastrup

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:43:43 +0100
From: Wilbert Berendsen <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: another problem with partcombine
To: address@hidden
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Op dinsdag 24 november 2009 schreef Stefan:

> Dear community,
> I've got another problem with partcombine.
> Is there a possibilitie to force lilypond to print the following (whithin
> the partcombine-command) in tow different voices?
> \version "2.12.2"
>
> upper = \relative c' {
> r8 c e g e c
> }
> lower = \relative c' {
> c4 r2
> }
>
> all ={ \new Staff { \partcombine \upper \lower } }
> \score { \all }
>

The partcombine command tries to "melt" the voices together. It you want to
have 2 different voices you don't need the partcombine command, just enter the
two voices with a voice separator in between, like the second score in this
example:

upper = \relative c' {
r8 c e g e c
}

lower = \relative c' {
c4 r2
}

\score {
\new Staff { \partcombine \upper \lower }
}

\score {
\new Staff << \upper \\ \lower >>
}

or:

\score {
\new Staff <<
\new Voice { \voiceOne \upper }
\new Voice { \voiceTwo \lower }
>>
}

best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen

--
Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/
Nederlands LilyPond forum: http://www.lilypondforum.nl/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/lilypond-user/attachments/20091124/5dff2065/attachment.html

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:57:23 +1100
From: Nick Payne <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: \set vs \override
To: James Worlton <address@hidden>
Cc: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

James Worlton wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
>
>> On this subject of set vs override, if I want rehearsal marks to be
>> boxed letters and also want to use the letter I as a rehearsal mark,
>> how can I do that. Each set command overwrites the previous value of
>> the context property, so if I use:
>>
>> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters
>> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-alphabet
>>
>> then I get "I" as a rehearsal mark but the letters aren't boxed, and
>> if I use:
>>
>> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-alphabet
>> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters
>>
>
> In 2.13.6 I did a project and used:
> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-alphabet
> and I got the boxes and the letter I (all in one command!)
Thanks for that. That particular value for set
(format-mark-box-alphabet) doesn't seem to appear anywhere in the
documentation - or at least, I can't find it in the PDF documentation,
which is what I use.

Nick

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

End of lilypond-user Digest, Vol 84, Issue 102
**********************************************

From:	Stefan Thomas
Subject:	Re: lilypond-user Digest, Vol 84, Issue 102
Date:	Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:58:25 +0100