Re: question about tablature

[Trevor Daniels]

Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, December 26, 2009 7:07 PM

> On 12/26/09 10:21 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> 
> wrote:
>
> > Carl Sorensen wrote Saturday, December 26, 2009 1:19 PM
> >
> > > On 12/26/09 5:16 AM, "Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > James Bailey wrote Saturday, December 26, 2009 9:37 AM
> > > > Subject: question about tablature
> > > >
> > > > > I don't know much about tablature, but are eighth notes 
> > > > > supposed
> > > > > to
> > > > > have stems and beams?
> > > >
> > > > Yes, if \tabFullNotation is invoked.
> > > >
> > > > But there is a bug in 2.13.9 which prevents
> > > > autobeaming working in tablature.  Maybe this is
> > > > what you are seeing.
> > >
> > > Has this bug been posted on the issues list?
> >
> > No.  Happy to do so, but I sent this message
> > to -bug, thinking you might want to have a
> > look at it first, in case it was something
> > trivial.
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2009-12/msg00407.html
>
>
> Beaming works fine for me on 2.13.10, as tested with
> input/regression/tablature-full-notation.ly.
>
> I would expect that this error comes from a new (2.13.10) version 
> of
> scm/auto-beam.scm, and a 2.13.9 binary.
>
> If you can send me a file that doesn't work, I'll investigate 
> further.

Carl, sorry, sorry!  This is all a red herring :(

I'd updated my git repo without doing a fresh make,
so my scm code was incompatible with the c++ binary.
That was the cause of the error I saw.  All seems
fine after a fresh make.

I guess I haven't yet got used to running binaries
from git after 3 years of running GUB binaries.  Another
lesson learned.

Trevor