[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: svg output
From: |
David Raleigh Arnold |
Subject: |
Re: svg output |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jan 2010 09:56:24 -0500 |
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:09:36 +0000
Graham Percival <address@hidden> wrote:
> new feature (*cough* bugfix)
What does that mean?
Why wasn't svg output fixed when it broke? Is there is a
problem with priorities? Doesn't lilypond's on line output,
including the docs, look a million times better with svg?
Isn't that important? So it's ancient history, so what?
Why the rant? Regards, daveA
- svg output, David Raleigh Arnold, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, Patrick McCarty, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, Patrick McCarty, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, David Raleigh Arnold, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, Graham Percival, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output, Patrick McCarty, 2010/01/14
- Re: svg output,
David Raleigh Arnold <=
- Re: svg output, Graham Percival, 2010/01/16
- Re: svg output, Hugh Myers, 2010/01/16
- Re: svg output, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/01/18
- Re: svg output, Graham Percival, 2010/01/18
- Re: svg output, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/01/18
- Re: svg output, Graham Percival, 2010/01/18