Re: LM 2.13.24 (HTML)

[James Lowe]

Patrick,

The patch has been made and applied.

Thanks for your time.

James

On 21/06/2010 18:46, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> Am 19.06.2010 um 19:05 schrieb James Lowe:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > On 19 Jun 2010, at 16:57, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > some observations concerning the HTML version of the Learning Manual…
> > >
> > > 2.2.4 Combining notes into chords
> > > In the following example the square brackets don't make much sense as
> > > there is no real need for them:
> > > r4 <c e g>8[ <c f a>]~ <c f a>2 |
> > > r4 <c e g>8( <c e g>\> <c e g>4 <c f a>\!) |
> > > To show that beams and ties can be combined with chords I'd rather
> > > suggest something like that:
> > > <c e g>8<c e g>8 <c e g>8[ <c f a>]~ <c f a>2 |
> > > r4 <c e g>8( <c e g>\> <c e g>4 <c f a>\!) |
> >
> > I agree to a point. I think an example should show default behaviour
> > first, then progress so we could add one more measure and show
> >
> > <c e g>8 <c e g>8 <c e g> <c f a>~ <c f a>2 |
> > <c e g>8\< <c f a> <c f a>2 \times 2/3 { <c e g>8 <c e g> <c e g>\! } |
> > <c e g>8. <c e g>16\( <c e g>8 <c e g>([ <c e g>8] <c f a>4.)\) |
> >
> > That way you see what the beaming does (without any extra notation)
> > and then the second example shows other beaming styles and the third
> > shows other markups that are common. That way we cover most of the
> > basics but in increments.
> >
> > What do you think?
> Sounds/Looks good to me.
>
> patrick
> > James