[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: best practices
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Re: best practices |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:32:14 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Mon 20 Sep 2010, 10:08 David Kastrup wrote:
> Anyway, if we have a sender knowing abbreviations, and a receiver _not_
> knowing them, they are not as much convenient for communication as for
> establishing superiority.
That was not about a (polite and convenient for all) way to answer emails in
this list -- only about that abbreviations are convenient (if not, they would
not appear in dictionaries at all).
I would say that abbreviations in this list appear far more often then
"inconveniences" in communication; that's why i would think about how to make
abbreviations clear.
ps. "Inconveniences" are far more important, i agree;
let's not to waste bytes "discussing" this .)
pps. Anyway, _any_ criticism must be attempting to be be constructive;
that's why i would think about how to make abbreviations clear.
ppps. [O:= Nothing more. Not to flame =:O]
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
Bug Squad
Be careful! These are some commonly used abbreviations:
• LM -- Learning Manual
• NR -- Notation Reference
• IR -- Internal Reference
Look at LilyPond’s documentation to find more.
- Re: best practices, (continued)
- Re: best practices, Phil Holmes, 2010/09/19
- Re: best practices, David Kastrup, 2010/09/19
- Re: best practices, Graham Percival, 2010/09/19
- Re: best practices, Martin Tarenskeen, 2010/09/19
- Re: best practices, Graham Percival, 2010/09/19
- Re: best practices, David Kastrup, 2010/09/20
- Re: best practices, aliteralmind, 2010/09/22
- Re: best practices, Phil Holmes, 2010/09/19
- Re: best practices, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/09/20
- Re: best practices, David Kastrup, 2010/09/20
- Re: best practices,
Dmytro O. Redchuk <=
- Re: best practices, Trevor Daniels, 2010/09/19
- Re: best practices, Phil Holmes, 2010/09/19
- Re: best practices, Jeff Epstein, 2010/09/19