[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram
From: |
Ralf Mattes |
Subject: |
Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:45:53 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:19:21 +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> I think that
>
> \makeStringTuning #'violinTuning <e' a d g>
>
> would be more natural. Even more natural would be
>
> \makeStringTuning #'violinTuning <g d a e'>
>
> And if we want to be correct, we'd better use
>
> \makeStringTuning #'violinTuning <g d' a' e''>
But does this also preserve ordering of notes? There are quite some
stringed instruments with reentrant tuning.
baroqueGuitarTuning = \makeStringTuning <a d' g b e'>
Cheers, Ralf Mattes
- pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Marc Mouries, 2010/12/21
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Marc Hohl, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Valentin Villenave, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Marc Mouries, 2010/12/22
- Re: pb with 2.13 with doc example fret diagram, Carl Sorensen, 2010/12/22