[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: horizontal beams
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: horizontal beams |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jan 2011 13:25:45 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.101115 |
Hello
-----Original Message-----
From: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 10:45:26 -0200
To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: horizontal beams
>>Then I think we might need to find out if \override Beam #'damping =
>>#+inf.0 without any extra tweaks *should* work in all cases or not. If it
>>should then we have a bug and it should be reported as such.
>
>yes, i think that the tweak definitely should work without further
>tweaks. it looks more like a bug than anything else to me. but since
>i'm not very knowledgeable about lilypond, i'm not confident to report
>it as a bug.
I've posted the .ly example (plus a modification of mine to illustrate
another anomaly and a screenshot) on the bug mailing list.
Regards
James
- Re: horizontal beams, (continued)
- Re: horizontal beams, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/19
- Re: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/20
- RE: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/20
- RE: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/21
- RE: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/21
- RE: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams, ljc, 2011/01/22
- Re: horizontal beams,
James Lowe <=
- Re: horizontal beams, James Lowe, 2011/01/26