[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Single-staff polyphony
|
From: |
-Eluze |
|
Subject: |
Re: Single-staff polyphony |
|
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 22:46:01 -0800 (PST) |
Richard Opheim wrote:
>
> It's my belief that the following code should have produced a 16-bar
> single-staff polyphony, but instead, the second voice follows the first
> voice consecutively and I get 32 bars.
>
usually a polyphonic sequence is enclosed in << … >> - see 1.5.2 in NR.
in your score you should use
\new Staff << instead of \new Staff {
hth
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Single-staff-polyphony-tp31122468p31122594.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.