Re: transpose

[Francisco Vila]

2011/6/3 Peter O'Doherty <address@hidden>:
> On 06/03/2011 12:45 AM, Francisco Vila wrote:
>>
>> 2011/6/2 Peter O'Doherty<address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> Thank you all for your help. David's solution was just the one I needed.
>>> Best wishes,
>>> Peter
>>
>> Here is a beautiful example of something I've been suspecting for
>> months.  No matter how fast I reply to a question in this list, my
>> reply only reaches other recipients's mailboxes after several hours.
>> :-(
>
> I'm not sure if that's correct. I sent my original message at 17:00 but
> didn't reply until 20:38. The delay was therefore mine. (I'm also replying
> to this message at 07:48 after receiving it at 12:45!)

Oh, I am not blaming you. My concern is, my reply was 15 minutes after
your first message, and every single further answer seems to ignore
that one.  That occurred _many_ times in this list, and it's really
discouraging.  I can only guess the problem is that my own messages
last hours to reach others.  Or maybe reading previous replies before
writing a new one is not as common as I thought.

-- 
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com