|
From: | Nick Payne |
Subject: | Re: 2.14 docs PDF portfolio |
Date: | Wed, 08 Jun 2011 06:49:03 +1000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 07/06/11 17:05, Francisco Vila wrote:
2011/6/7 Nick Payne<address@hidden>:I have created a searchable indexed PDF portfolio from the 2.14 English PDF docs (Extending, Internals, Learning, Notation, Snippets, Usage, and Web) and uploaded it to http://www.users.on.net/~njpayne/music/lilydoc.pdf. You need Adobe Reader 9.x or later. 3rd party PDF readers can't cope with PDF portfolios.Okular offers to save all embedded files. Is there a difference between this and a single PDF with all the pages of each document, plus some added pages at the beginning? If not, it is easy to make one using pdftk which would be readable with free software.
They're not the same beast. With a PDF portfolio there is already an embedded index, and you can search for a term across all the embedded files at once, and get back, in a separate window, a clickable list of the hits and which file(s) they occur in. If you just concatenate the separate PDFs, searching will a) be slow, and b) be sequential only.
Nick
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |