Re: font survey: which clef do you prefer?

[Dmytro O. Redchuk]

On Sat 09 Jul 2011, 01:58 Janek Warchoł wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> currently it is:
> right:
[...]
> Dmytro

Actually, I would like the third (right one) to be a bit higher (and deeper, 
probably).

I would definitely like to try it myself...

So, for now it's "oh well...", not more.

> 
> therefore i'm opening a Rietveld issue: http://codereview.appspot.com/4664070
> 
> 2011/7/6 Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden>:
> > However, even in the third clef, the curvature of the vertical line looks a 
> > bit too straight in the lower half...
> 
> I agree that even the third clef could be improved, but i don't think
> i'm able to make it any better myself.  If you want to try, i attach
> my patch. A tip to speed up work: use this script to generate a dvi
> preview of glyphs (no need to run make, and it also shows metafont
> control points):
> #!/bin/bash
> mf '\mode:=proof; input feta20'
>  gftodvi feta20.2602gf \
>  && mv feta20.dvi feta20new.proof.dvi
> 
> If you have trouble figuring out what to change, ask.
> 
> W dniu 8 lipca 2011 00:14 użytkownik James Lowe
> <address@hidden> napisał:
> > until you really print out a score and plop it on your music stand and then 
> > have sharps and flats and time signatures and other ornamentation, I don't 
> > really think one can make a definite case for either.
> 
> True.  Please send me some 2.15.5-compatible input files and i'll
> compile them with my suggested clef, so we'll have some real-life
> example to study.  I'll also take something from my collection.
> 
> thanks,
> Janek
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

-- 
  Dmytro O. Redchuk
  Bug Squad