[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond lobbying?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond lobbying? |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:33:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Janek Warchoł <address@hidden> writes:
> I am very surprised that so many of the LilyPond users are composers!
> I was quite sure that Lily is mostly suited for engravers and editors.
Well, what would you call it if you are practicing musician using
Lilypond for putting down your own arrangements and work scores?
It's like saying "I am very surprised that so many word processor users
are writers rather than editors and publishers". What else but writing
would you be using the program for, even though you may not make a
professional living from it?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, (continued)
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2011/08/23
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Francois Planiol, 2011/08/23
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Urs Liska, 2011/08/23
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/23
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Tim McNamara, 2011/08/23
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Graham Percival, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, David Kastrup, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Robert Schmaus, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Kieren MacMillan, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Robert Schmaus, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Janek Warchoł, 2011/08/25
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Francois Planiol, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, Urs Liska, 2011/08/24
- Re: Lilypond lobbying?, PMA, 2011/08/24