Re: Default beaming for 3/4

[Hans Aberg]

On 26 Aug 2011, at 15:14, Hans Aberg wrote:

> On 26 Aug 2011, at 13:07, Nick Payne wrote:
> 
>> According to Gould (p.153, about half way down the page), the Lilypond 
>> default beaming for 3/4 is incorrect in the following example; it should be 
>> beamed as in the second bar:
>> 
>> \version "2.14.2"
>> 
>> \relative c' {
>>   \time 3/4
>>   c4. c8 c c
>>   c4. c8 c[ c]
>> }
> 
> The first measure is called "in three", that is, beams are broken, so as to 
> indicate beats. The second is called "in one"; engraved as though there are 
> no beats. 

Oops, typo! - It is the reverse. When the beams are broken, it is in three; 
when not, in one.

Hans