[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Three voices plus tie in RH - notation best practice?
From: |
James Harkins |
Subject: |
Re: Three voices plus tie in RH - notation best practice? |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:23:46 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/23.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
At Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:02:41 +0200,
Francisco Vila wrote:
> I changed this to
>
> a2. a4~ \shiftOff a2
>
> and the collision is avoided although you obtain a chord and a warning
> instead of nice voice independence.
and
> a satisfying solution could be
>
> \once \override Tie #'details = #'((note-head-gap . 1.1))
> \once \override Tie #'extra-offset = #'( -.5 . -.8 )
> a4~
> \once \override NoteColumn #'force-hshift = #.2 a2
>
> but of course this seems very experimental?
Thanks, but the question was not, "How do I make the tie look better?" The
question was, "What is the best way to notate this content?" Or, "If you're a
professional engraver given this to typeset as a job, how would you change it
to make the intent clearer?"
If the answer is, "nothing, just make the tie look better," then I'm fine with
that... but I want to be sure this is the question that's being answered.
Thanks,
James
--
James Harkins /// dewdrop world
address@hidden
http://www.dewdrop-world.net
"Come said the Muse,
Sing me a song no poet has yet chanted,
Sing me the universal." -- Whitman
blog: http://www.dewdrop-world.net/words
audio clips: http://www.dewdrop-world.net/audio
more audio: http://soundcloud.com/dewdrop_world/tracks