Re: accidental style - cancel note within chord

[Neil Thornock]

Yes, that makes sense.

How do I submit an enhancement request?  To "bugs"?

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Keith OHara <address@hidden> wrote:
> Neil Thornock <neilthornock <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Is there a way to create an accidental style that
>> checks for *simultaneous* pitches in any octave, resulting, in this
>> example, in a natural on the top note?
>>
>
>
> No, unfortunately; the information available to the accidental-setting rule
> is only the set of accidentals in /previous/ notes and key signature. An
> unfortunate design choice, but one I can forgive because in traditional
> music simultaneous conflicting accidentals are rare.
>
> No doubt, you know how to force accidentals. <f! fis!>
>
> I don't see an enhancement request to solve this problem; the closest
> is <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1134>.  The manual
> does explain the limitation in the section on
> Pitches::DisplayingPitches::AutomaticAccidentals.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user



-- 
Neil Thornock, D.M.
No Stopping, Standing, or Parking:
http://neilthornock.net/mp3s/nostopping.mp3
Assistant Professor of Music
Composition/Theory
Brigham Young University