[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?)
From: |
Shane Brandes |
Subject: |
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?) |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2012 00:07:58 -0500 |
Do you mean by your scores? your compositions or your typesetting of
other's compositions?
Shane
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:00 PM, PMA <address@hidden> wrote:
> P.S. Selling is not an issue.
>
>
> PMA wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your response. But I see that we are way apart on this.
>> Adapting/customizing the result is exactly what I mean to prevent.
>> I want these products closed indeed. Naturally, unrealized scoring
>> improvements will remain on my head.
>>
>>
>> Francisco Vila wrote:
>>>
>>> 2012/1/16 PMA<address@hidden>:
>>>>
>>>> P.S. By "scores" I mean only PDFs (not also their .ly sources).
>>>
>>>
>>> Publish the sources along the scores. Without the sources the user can
>>> not adapt/customize the result, can not study how are they made and
>>> nobody learns a bit. Your work is yours and you deserve attribution,
>>> but unless you plan to sell them as a closed product, in my humble
>>> opinion that would be very good.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
- ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/15
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/16
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), Francisco Vila, 2012/01/16
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/16
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/16
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?),
Shane Brandes <=
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/17
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), David Kastrup, 2012/01/17
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/17
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), David Kastrup, 2012/01/17
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), Francisco Vila, 2012/01/17
- Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), PMA, 2012/01/17
Re: ISMLP/WIMA (?), David Raleigh Arnold, 2012/01/17