[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reduce width of single measure
|
From: |
Xavier Scheuer |
|
Subject: |
Re: Reduce width of single measure |
|
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2012 23:41:17 +0100 |
On 21 January 2012 23:28, Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I played around with your function. And now I wonder why your function
> is not the default behaviour.
I can understand that (although I am not sure about what should be the
"standard notation"). If you think it should be the default behaviour,
please make a request in that sense to bug-lilypond.
Cheers,
Xavier
--
Xavier Scheuer <address@hidden>
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, (continued)
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, Frank Steinmetzger, 2012/01/16
- Lyric alignment under Second intervals, Frank Steinmetzger, 2012/01/16
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, James, 2012/01/17
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, Thomas Morley, 2012/01/19
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, David Nalesnik, 2012/01/19
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, Thomas Morley, 2012/01/19
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, David Nalesnik, 2012/01/19
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, David Nalesnik, 2012/01/19
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, Thomas Morley, 2012/01/21
- Re: Reduce width of single measure,
Xavier Scheuer <=
- Re: Reduce width of single measure, Frank Steinmetzger, 2012/01/20